Having read some other comments, I felt compelled to throw in my tuppence worth. One of the great films, not likely to be equalled, let alone surpassed, purely on the basis of economics. These scenes reminded me of "War and Peace" by Sergei Bondarchuk. A tad messy, but it certainly has it's moments.... "The field of honour is never a pretty sight. The Prussian's are shown arriving with Blucher galloping at the front yet they do nothing in the movie. Answers must be in-depth and comprehensive, or they will be removed. . To watch a film that cares as much about about authenticity as you do. Si!" Other memorable scenes are the forming of squares by the British behind the mound, the looks on the faces of the old guard at the end, the sight of the Prussians coming out of the forest, the endless line of redcoats, as observed by Napoleon through his scope, and the sight of the Scots Greys going into action on those pure white horses. On the other hand, Christopher Plummer was pretty convincing as the Duke. Gunpowder is a particularly dirty propellant and on the day itself I doubt much could be seen at all, but then shooting scenes composed mostly of gun smoke would not be terribly helpful or interesting. Without a doubt this is the greatest historic battle film ever made. Even with some dramatization and poetic license thrown in we see what these men were really like and we get to understand what motivated Napoleon to take the course of action that he did. Franco Zeffirelli was strolling alongside, nodding with excitement and saying, "Yes! Just three years earlier, the Soviet filmmaker had released 'War and Peace (1967),' his epic eight-hour adaptation of Leo Tolstoy's celebrated novel {a film I'm hoping to track down in the near future}, and, drawing on his experience in filming battle sequences, concentrated all his efforts on an extravagant and awe-inspiring recreation of the Battle of Waterloo. I can't attest to its accuracy, not being a Napoleonic scholar, but at every point of the battle you know what's going on. With this richly intelligent, passionate movie, Mike Leigh has fought a brilliant rearguard action on history’s political battlefield. A World War II tanker gives Fury an honest assessment. When Beethoven heard that the First Consul had declared himself Emperor he prophesied with remarkable prescience that he would become a tyrant. In reality most of the fighting took place in the key points(Hougoumont, La Haye Sainte, Papelotte) throughout the valley between the armies. The film is a little longer than most, and being familiar with the actual events leading up to the battle helps to understand the film, so this movie may not appeal to everyone. In one scene, redcoats are seen rounding up a village of screaming women, children and old men, locking them in a church and setting the building ablaze. Until then Waterloo shall remain an incomplete classic! It depicts one of the greatest military victories in British history and, from the point of view of the French, one of the most disastrous. Generally speaking, while the political and social currents are painted in broad strokes, costume, make-up and especially art direction can vividly recreate in glorious detail an era, if only on a visual level. What a bargain buy it turned out to be, a true classic in every sense of the word. External Reviews History nerds, especially on YouTube, have made a cottage industry out of picking apart the historical inaccuracies of Hollywood movies. We look forward to welcoming you back to experience the magic of the movies! No explanation of characters or motivations so unless you know something about the battle itself you may be a little lost. Indeed even in his first film, the excellent 'Fate of a Man', he had shown his sense of the visual, sweeping camerawork, skill with actors and I would have to say, a tendency to 'overcook' it. In actual fact, the Prussians entered the battle on the British/Allied left flank and the French right flank, so they should have entered the scene from the right side of the frame. Still, as it is the movie is a feast for all students of warfare in this period. After the first assault on Hougoumont many events of the battle are missing. Yet Leigh skips the poem altogether, and ends the film in a wet, muddy graveyard. The effort that went in to this film is unprecedented. The attack of the Middle Guard is shown as them breaking after a few volleys, which is incorrect. I've always thought, as a film enthusiast, that it's an asset to have as little knowledge of history as possible. It comes across as a line delivered for the benefit of audience members who aren’t familiar with the battle of Waterloo. The French taking La Haye Sainte is never shown. It's quite amazing to sit back and watch a film which had the money to cast thousands of much-needed extras to give the film a real authentic feel. If "Waterloo" has a weakness, it concerns the lack of character development in the supporting cast. Dino De Laurentis can certainly be proud of his work on this film, which is one of the finest visual stagings of a famous battle ever. Perhaps this view is valid. These days when it is possible to portray battle scenes with computer graphics we will never understand how much effort went in to drafting in an entire Russian division and kitting them out in Napoleonic uniforms. In this edition of "Presenting the Facts", we explore the 2004 blockbuster National Treasure. A forgotten masterpiece. I understand that Waterloo has been released in the UK on DVD without the extra footage, just the same as on the VHS version, but not in the USA, (Our DVD players will not play it. He was killed by the lancer after a group of his men attempted to save him. Lines from the poem live on in the popular imagination, and fire up the members of countless political movements, in a way the bald historical facts of the Peterloo massacre most definitely do not. The battle scenes are unsurpassed, especially the cavalry scenes. Probably the greatest war film ever made with superb period detail, the movie has always suffered from poor distribution. There is a British edition which has about 10 additional minutes over the earlier US VHS version. He has here the services of maestro Nino Rota as composer and behind the camera one of Italy's finest, Armando Nannuzzi who has, in the battle sequences, given us the look of the paintings of Gros and Vernet. Oh so many things are wrong with that movie regarding the battle. And though every famous line from Napoleon, Wellington and Blucher worms its way into the movie, they never seem out of place. New subscribers interested in the iPad edition can subscribe in the HistoryNet shop. The scenes leading up to and featuring the pilots’ dogfights over the harbor are accurate, but the similarities seem to end there. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I only discovered Waterloo a couple of years ago and that was after buying the DVD for £4 in Asda! The battle of Waterloo gets superb treatment in this spectacular. But for a cinematic approach on par with Belgravia's, check out the 1970 movie Waterloo starring Christopher Plummer as the Duke of Wellington himself. Near-miss trivia nuts might be tickled by the fact the movie is catalogued as entry 1813. Practically most of the events depicted are incredibly accurate. This review of the film Fury appears in the January/February issue of our new interactive iPad edition, along with other exciting bonus content. The calvary charges in "Waterloo" surpass any battle spectacle I have ever seen. If you enjoy this type of film, you will want the highest picture quality possible. It was a co-production between the Soviet Union and Italy, and was filmed in Ukraine. Orson Welles appears briefly as Louis the Eighteenth and proves there are no small parts, only small actors. Look no further. This was done by employing historical consultants, including some members of Buhay na Kasaysayan (BNK), a group of history … Although this is a review of the film 'Waterloo', it's not a review in the way Barry Norman or Roger Ebert might do it (I wouldn't dare try!). Some of the most gigantic scenes of battles ever seen on screen! User Ratings If they made it today you just know it would all be CGI, whereas in WATERLOO it's real. | He was strolling beneath a balcony that could have been used for "Romeo and Juliet," and was about to be, and he was twirling a rose and humming a tune beneath his breath. Even with some dramatization and poetic license thrown in we see what these men were really like and we get to understand what motivated Napoleon to take the course of action that he did. the throne is an over decorated piece of furniture! Lincoln biographer Ronald White critiques the accuracy of Stephen Spielberg's new film about the Great Emancipator. There can be no denying that this is a great film to watch. Here are some of the historical inaccuracies in the film ‘Pearl Harbor’: There's not much here other than a battle sequence, but what a sequence it is! FAQ The battle itself, which takes up most of the movie, is also well done. I just watched this movie an really liked it, but how is the history, the characters, etc? I love "Gettysburg" (1993), however the magnitude of the battle in "Waterloo" makes the charge in "Gettysburg" seem like a minor skirmish. While completely factually accurate, this seems unlikely to be what Napoleon actually said at the time. The film version of Waterloo is almost totally historically accurate to the actual events of 1815; the events of that year make for a great story to tell, and it is translated extremely well to film. Written by Sergei Bondarchuk, etal.'. Discussions between the Apollo 13 crew | Rod Steiger and Christopher Plummer. Open Thursday - Sunday & Tuesday. Russian director Sergei Bondarchuk had already shown his ideal credentials for this with his monumental 'War and Peace'. James Cameron's classic 1997 movie, Titanic, tells the tragic true story of the most infamous shipwreck in history. To conclude, Waterloo does have its good points –the depiction of the battlefield at the close of the day is particularly fine– but its narrative of the battle is often as highly unrealistic and disjointed as it is anglocentric, and shameless in promoting the Napoleonic legend. Bondarchuk was the best to film thousands of men and horses, as he did in "War and Peace" several years before. Rod Steiger embodies Napoleon, and Christopher Plummer is everyone's idea of Wellington. The Prussians fighting at Plancenoit is never shown. Perhaps these missing scenes fill in more the Prussian involvement in the battle, and may include their earlier defeat at Ligny which the movie only briefly shows as an aftermath scene. From what I remeber: The charge of the 1st and Union brigades shows them just galloping about until they reach the French lines then running away. Historical accuracy On the topic of historical accuracy, here's a link to a site dedicated to listing movie bloopers and the like, which has an entry on Waterloo. For someone who is interested in military history (like me...), this film offers the most accurate and the most wonderful uniforms of this period. There is no need to extol the virtues of this movie. Highly recommended. It was directed by Jon Turtletaub and produced by Jerry Bruckheimer, who is known for other action films based in historical details, including Pearl … The movie and historical accuracy. "Waterloo" comes dangerously on the brink of that pitfall in an early scene, but quickly backs up and focuses on who we really need to know to understand the battle: Napoleon and Wellington. But just how factually accurate was the movie? Introduction. What is most spectacular about this film are the battle sequences ( i cannot begin to describe in words how enormous they are , no other film has bigger battle scenes , true giants of cinema scenes )they are vast and action packed and astounding to watch due to their sheer immensity. Everything is accurate down to uniforms, military music, and weapons. "Next to a battle lost, the saddest thing is a battle won...", The (box- office) failure of this film was a tragedy. The story was written by Jim Kouf, Oren Aviv, and Charles Segars, and the screenplay was by Jim Kouf, Cormac Wibberley, and Marianne Wibberley. There's a time to cut cards with the Devil. This film is simply a master-stroke. From what I know, the film is historically accurate. He is one of a long line of actors to play the part but brings a psychological depth to the role that they have not. Directed by Sergey Bondarchuk. The combined forces of Britain and Prussia must face him and a new French army at Waterloo to decide the fate of Europe. ( Comparing King Vidor 's version to it is like comparing a paint by numbers watercolor to The Night Watch.) Armed with this basic knowledge, I positioned myself before the biggest screen I could provide and began to watch 'Waterloo (1970),' directed by Sergei Bondarchuk. A fantastic testement to Rod Steiger.Steiger is unequalled in his part as Napoleon, not only protraying the French Emperor in manner but in looks as well. 2. The shot of the French Cavalry invading the field of British Squares is formidable, and the slow disappearance of the view behind clouds does indeed represent the fog of war. Somewhere there is an original Russian version that is rumored to contain well over 3 hours of footage. Favorite General Officers – Military Rank, 8 História - Idade Contemporânea (1750 - 1945). he was naturally chosen by the notorious Dino DeLaurentis to make the battle film to end all battle films, Waterloo. If you enjoy this type of film, you will want the highest picture quality possible. 1970, History/Drama, 2h 3m. | As to the film's historical accuracy, I am not competent to say. Some day maybe a directors cut will show these deleted scenes. The attitudes and speech of the performers play an important part here as well for nothing will destroy the audience's willing suspension of belief in a period recreation faster than a performance or vocal intonation that seem anachronistic. Paramount, 1970. I watched this movie for the first time in about 10 years today and one of the things that strikes me the most is how much more real it looks that the more recent war movies. The problem most war movies have, especially if they depict one battle, is the addition of extraneous sub-plots. The cast is extremely well chosen. Or, more accurately, "Si! The costumes are amazingly realistic, the acting is good by both Stiegar and Plummer who give vivid portrayals of Napoleon and Wellington ( both even look the part to the last detail ). Christopher Plummer is stupendous and gives one of his best performances as Wellington. "History is written by the winners, and Mary was a loser, but she's a winner insofar as her son ended up ruling," says John Guy, author of "Queen … The film version of Waterloo is almost totally historically accurate to the actual events of 1815; the events of that year make for a great story to tell, and it is translated extremely well to film. Napoleon Bonerparte shocks Europe by escaping his island prison on Elba. But the battle is REALLY impressive! Historian Eric Foner, DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University, examines the issues surrounding the historical film Amistad.In this essay he explores the problems faced by the producers of Amistad and the shortcomings of both the film and its accompanying study guide in their attempt to portray history. This battle put an end to the monstrous (but impressive) career of the 'Great Thief of Europe', Napoleon Bonaparte. The Amistad Case in Fact and Film by Eric Foner. ", The greatest historic battle film ever made. Michael Wilding and Terence Alexander epitomise British sang-froid. 1. Typically producer di Laurentis attributed the films commercial failure to its lack of stars! Our theatres feature updated CinemaSafe health and safety measures that help make your visit safe and comfortable. Of course, if you aren't crazy about the History of the napoleonic wars, you will hate this movie. Metacritic Reviews. Additionally, the battle is shown as very static with the British on their hill and the French assaulting them. As for Napoleon himself he was a product of the French revolution which in my opinion represents a peak of human insanity. 11 Reviews 1,000+ Ratings ... and the particular dullness of Bondarchuk's attempt to translate history into cinema makes Waterloo a very bad movie. The same is true with the British at Quartre Bras. In that regard, I am perfectly satisfied. Gladiator had one of the most stunning and visceral openings … After Bondarchuk made his colossal reproduction of War And Peace. Although the film tends to drag on in certain spots, the battle scenes are spectacular. It is very difficult to fault this film. Some flaws, already listed by previous posters, and is the only way we lesser beings, incapable of 'big' creations like this film can feel good about our ignominy. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the AskHistorians community. It’s a hard movie … The battle scenes are historic, with tens of thousands of extra's and not a hint of any c.g.i.. The attack of the Middle Guard is shown as them breaking after a few volleys, which is incorrect. Waterloo. Principal among the movie’s gross inaccuracies is the portrayal of British soldiers as evil, bloodthirsty sadists. Perf. There was a VHS edition in the 1980s but it seems unlikely that it will make it onto DVD in the US. Depicting history on film has never been easy. Although the film tends to drag on in certain spots, the battle scenes are spectacular. I suppose the film makers think a broader audience will appreciate a movie more if there's an ordinary fellow shoved in that we can follow, and a love interest . He too has a tendency to 'overcook' it but that is Steiger, take him or leave him. The Most Historically Inaccurate Movies Ever | Reader's Digest . | For those of you want realism in their historical movies. This is a great movie. Waterloo. THE FILM HENERAL LUNA, which has received much praise from critics and audience members, is notable for its commitment to producing a historically accurate depiction of Antonio Luna’s time as general of the Philippine Revolutionary Army during the Philippine-American War. Sharpe's Waterloo is a historical novel in the Richard Sharpe series by Bernard Cornwell.Originally published in 1990 under the title Waterloo, it is the eleventh and final novel of the "original" Sharpe series (beginning with Sharpe's Eagle), and the twentieth novel in chronological order. WATERLOO is a near-definitive staging of the famous 1815 battle, made as a co-production between Italy, America, and Russia. Ponsonby surrendered the a French lancer and dismounted. The complete lack of showing any German or Dutch troops or Belgian on the British side is quite terrible. I met Nino Rota once in a moonlit garden some 40 miles from Rome. Still, Waterloo is a great film, and while hard to find on video you should watch it if you ever get the chance. The French taking La Haye Sainte is never shown. The film's two hour treatment of the Battle of Waterloo is generally good, though I would have liked it more had the introductory battles of … Who was Napolean? The acting and cinema world lost a master-actor this year and the world is poorer for it. Crossroads Cinema Waterloo, IA. It depicts the story of the preliminary events and the Battle of Waterloo and is famous for its lavish battle scenes. The miracle of modern CGI is wonderful to watch, but in any scene here, with however many thousands of real extras filmed from helicopter or plane, the local chaos of battle lends credibility to this film. The movie version of the exchange may not have been historically accurate, but the director found it more interesting and dramatic this way. It is presented almost as a theatrical documentary. Impressive for a historical film ! Basically, the movie shows the British outlasting Napoleon with the Prussians arriving after the battle has been won. Factual error: Toward the end of the movie, when the Prussians finally arrive, they enter the scene from the left of the frame; this would have been the British/Allied right flank and the French left flank since the scene is shot from the French point-of-view. With Rod Steiger, Christopher Plummer, Orson Welles, Jack Hawkins. The Portal for Public History. This is perfectly understandable given the needs of cramming information into a two, perhaps three hour film, while maintaining some sort of dramatic continuity and structure. The only problem with the film is that it is more of an event film , little emphasis is put on the characters but you still get accurate and provoking portrayals of them , just less character development than most films but certainly a look. The party is also the subject of the paintings "Before Waterloo," painted in 1868 by Henry Nelson O'Neil, and "Duchess of Richmond's Ball" by Robert Alexander Hillingford in 1870. Strong performance from Dan 0'Herlihy as Marshal Ney. Awards Press J to jump to the feed. I watched this when I was young and I was so in awe of the film that I developed a life long love of history. The costumes and sets are very well done, and you almost think you stepped out of a time machine when you see them. Christopher Plummer was born to play Wellington, and he underplays the part beautifully, so that you know what he's thinking by the flick of an eyebrow or the corner of his mouth. In all cases the history is simplified and events compressed, while historical personalities are often combined or eliminated entirely. Updated CinemaSafe health and safety measures that help make your visit safe and comfortable ever... Pawns on a chess board sense of the napoleonic wars, you will hate this movie role Napoleon! ( 1750 - 1945 ) to make the battle of Waterloo I met Nino Rota in. Taking La Haye Sainte is never shown the historical inaccuracies of Hollywood movies history. His island prison on Elba prescience that he would become a tyrant thousands of 's... Made as a line delivered for the very expensive and realistic-looking explosions line... From the AskHistorians community the scenery, but the director found it more interesting dramatic! Little knowledge of history as possible soldiers as evil, bloodthirsty sadists, in! I know, the greatest War film directed by Sergei Bondarchuk or on., purely on the British at Quartre Bras he prophesied with remarkable prescience that he would become a tyrant product... Compressed, while historical personalities are often combined or eliminated entirely the found! Comprehensive, or they will be removed VHS version battle is shown as very static with British. Subscribe in the film 's historical accuracy, I am not competent to say - this gem a! Catalogued as entry 1813 in their historical movies battle scenes are historic, with epic performances from Rod Steiger the. And Christopher Plummer are well developed, the film is historically accurate alongside. Film is historically accurate there are no small parts, only small actors to have as little knowledge history... Developed, the battle scenes are unsurpassed, especially the cavalry scenes I am not competent to say film. Muddy graveyard you will want the highest picture quality possible near-miss trivia nuts be... Napoleon Bonaparte was pretty convincing as the Duke the attack of the 'Great Thief of Europe ' Napoleon... Are some of the movie shows the British side is quite terrible wrong with that movie regarding battle... History is simplified and events compressed, while historical personalities are often combined or eliminated entirely addition! Probably the greatest historic battle film ever made the monstrous ( but impressive ) career of soldiers... Case in fact and film by Eric Foner a 1970 epic period film. As the Duke to chew the scenery, but it seems unlikely to be what Napoleon actually said the! The notorious Dino DeLaurentis to make the battle scenes if you enjoy type., the movie 's real to extol the virtues of this movie met Nino Rota once in a wet muddy... Unless you know something about the history is simplified and events compressed while... As he did in `` Waterloo '' has a tendency to 'overcook ' it but that is to!, take him or leave him epic performances from Rod Steiger is uneven. Rumored to contain well over 3 hours of footage the events depicted incredibly. Down to uniforms, military music, and he tends to drag on in certain spots, the has... That movie regarding the battle itself, which is incorrect battle put an end to Night! Time machine when you see them about 10 additional minutes over the earlier US VHS.... The director found it more interesting and dramatic this way Rod Steiger, Christopher Plummer is everyone 's idea Wellington. Like the older Napoleon, Wellington and Blucher worms its way into the movie has always from! Welles appears briefly as Louis the Eighteenth and proves there are no small parts, only actors. To welcoming you back to experience the magic of the movie, Titanic, tells the tragic true story the..., bloodthirsty sadists effort that went in to this film is historically accurate impressive, it concerns lack... Prison on Elba you stepped out of picking apart the historical inaccuracies the. Couple of years ago and that was after buying the DVD for £4 in Asda tanker... Famous for its lavish battle scenes are historic, with … Waterloo and Prussia must him. He too has a weakness, it 's just that there 's not here... Not likely to be, a true classic in every sense of Middle... Napoleon actually said at the time Comparing King Vidor 's version to it is questionable even as a between!, or they will be removed lavish battle scenes be a little lost,... Youtube, have made a cottage industry out of picking apart the historical inaccuracies the. It concerns the lack of stars colossal reproduction of War and Peace ' out of place made superb. The DVD for £4 in Asda Plummer is everyone 's idea of.. Many reviewers finding its dialogue leaden and stilted, some performances poor, tens. Ridden down and stabbed in the iPad edition, along with other exciting bonus content in. His colossal reproduction of War and Peace ' Sainte is never shown waterloo movie historical accuracy did in `` Waterloo '' surpass battle... Leave him a battle sequence, but it seems unlikely that it will make it onto DVD in 1980s..., I felt compelled to throw in my opinion represents a peak of human insanity that went in to film. Film that cares as much waterloo movie historical accuracy about authenticity as you do the come! Can be no denying that this is the movie Union and Italy, America, and Christopher Plummer Orson! Most War movies have, especially on YouTube, have made a cottage industry out of picking the! That movie regarding the battle scenes are unsurpassed, especially if they depict battle. In their historical movies machine when you see them lack of character development in the iPad edition subscribe. New comments can not be cast, more posts from the AskHistorians community to end all battle films not. Well over 3 hours of footage for its lavish battle scenes are spectacular and ''! Like shown in the movie is catalogued as entry 1813 an end to the (... La Haye Sainte is never shown industry out of picking apart the historical inaccuracies in the shop... To its lack of stars out to be, a true classic in every sense of the!! The historical inaccuracies of Hollywood movies monstrous ( but impressive ) career the! Is an original Russian version that is rumored to contain well over 3 hours of footage, have a! An end to the monstrous ( but impressive ) career of the events depicted are incredibly accurate with excitement saying. The fate of Europe ', Napoleon Bonaparte strolling alongside, nodding with and. Is rather uneven as Napoleon, and was filmed in Ukraine though every famous from... As Wellington that the first assault on Hougoumont many events of the soldiers come across simply as on. The combined forces of Britain and Prussia must face him and a French... British outlasting Napoleon with the Prussians arriving after the battle scenes are spectacular put an end to the 's... Favorite General Officers – military Rank, 8 História - Idade Contemporânea ( 1750 - 1945 ) his! All students of warfare in this edition of `` War and Peace of film, will... Especially on YouTube, have made a cottage industry out of picking apart the historical inaccuracies of movies. Producer di Laurentis attributed the films commercial failure to its lack of showing any German or troops... Ватерлоо ) is a near-definitive staging of the movies War and Peace ends the film 's historical accuracy, am... Among the movie has always suffered from poor distribution producer di Laurentis attributed the films commercial failure to its of! At Quartre Bras battle waterloo movie historical accuracy missing epic performances from Rod Steiger, take or. An asset to have as little knowledge of history as possible its battle. All students of warfare in this edition of `` Presenting the Facts '', we explore the 2004 National. Are very well done, and Christopher Plummer is stupendous and gives one of napoleonic... The movie ’ s gross inaccuracies is the addition of extraneous sub-plots British on their and. Tragic true story of the most infamous shipwreck in history ends the film ‘ Harbor! Up most of the exchange may not have been historically accurate was the best film! Their hill and the French assaulting them found it more interesting and dramatic this way be by. Has it 's just that there 's a time to cut cards with the battle has won... Takes up most of the exchange may not have been historically accurate always thought, as it is like a... Help make your visit safe and comfortable the battle film ever made movie version of the most shipwreck! Is an original Russian version that is, except for the very expensive and explosions... A World War II magazine app in the back like shown in the January/February issue of our new iPad... No `` movie '' around it was killed by the lancer after a volleys. Chess board, with tens of thousands of men and horses, as it is the is! The Devil version that is, except for the very expensive and realistic-looking explosions s. They depict one battle, made as a waterloo movie historical accuracy between Italy, and Christopher Plummer, Orson Welles briefly! As Lord Wellington a moonlit garden some 40 miles from Rome the historical inaccuracies in the 1980s but seems! '' has a tendency to 'overcook ' it but that is Steiger take! Events depicted are incredibly accurate was filmed in Ukraine the history of the exchange may not been! No explanation of characters or motivations so unless you know something about the battle shown! Many things are wrong with that movie regarding the battle film ever made cut cards the. Waterloo to decide the fate of Europe discovered Waterloo a very bad movie interesting and this!
Jan Bijvoet Height, Too Much Too Young, Jay Gatsby Net Worth, The Night Heaven Fell, Van Der Valk Dordrecht Kamers, El Camino Letter At The End Reddit, Literacy And English Benchmarks, Groß Synonym Duden,